GOLDEN STATE TRANSIT CORP. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. 88-840.

493 U.S. 103 (1989)

GOLDEN STATE TRANSIT CORP. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 5, 1989


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zachary D. Fasman argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

John F. Haggerty argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.*


JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608 (1986) (Golden State I), we held that the respondent city had violated federal law by conditioning the renewal of petitioner's taxicab franchise on settlement of a pending labor dispute between petitioner and its union. On remand, the District Court enjoined the city to reinstate the franchise but concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases