QUAM v. UNITED FIRE & CAS. CO.

No. C7-89-184.

440 N.W.2d 131 (1989)

Jay QUAM, Appellant, v. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 12, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet Stellpflug, James F. Dunn & Associates, St. Paul, for appellant.

Mark Peschel, Johnson & Lindberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., RANDALL and KALITOWSKI, JJ.


OPINION

PARKER Judge.

Appellant Jay Quam challenges the trial court's order granting respondent United Fire & Casualty Company's request to quash Quam's demand for arbitration of no-fault benefits. Quam also contends the trial court erred in finding that United Fire had compensated him for all future medical expenses. We affirm.

FACTS

Jay Quam was involved as a passenger in a one-vehicle accident which occurred in Minneapolis on March...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases