Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that statements he made to the police while in custody and the complainant's testimony about the lineup identification should have been suppressed because the law enforcement officials knew that he had an open case in which he was represented by counsel but no effort was made to contact counsel or have them present during the custodial interrogation or at the lineup. After a Wade/Huntley hearing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
