Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), 7-101(A)(2), and 1-102 (A)(4). We also find that respondent violated Gov. Bar R. V(5)(a) and VI. However, because we understand from respondent's argument before this court that he was experiencing serious psychological problems during the events at issue, we reject the board's recommendation.
Instead, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
