Respondents defaulted in serving a bill of particulars in this medical malpractice action, which was first demanded by appellant in April 1984. Appellant twice sought a preclusion order and on October 7, 1987 a conditional order of preclusion was issued on consent of respondents' counsel. Although the order required respondents to serve the bill of particulars by December 18, 1987, it was not served until respondents moved to be relieved of their default in complying with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
