1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 113 Wn.2d
  5. 113 Wn.2d 143 (1989)
 

FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC. v. CITY OF TACOMA

No. 55619-9.

113 Wn.2d 143 (1989)

776 P.2d 136

FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC., Respondent, v. THE CITY OF TACOMA, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 20, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Backstein, City Attorney, and William J. Barker, F.H. Chapin, Jr., and Harding T. Roe, Assistants, for appellant.

McGavick, Graves, Beale & McNerthney, by Joseph P. Jackowski, for respondent.

PEARSON, J.

The issue presented is whether Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc. is an "other financial institution" within the meaning of RCW 82.14A.010, so as to be entitled to a retail sales tax classification under the B&O tax in accordance with our ruling in Tacoma v. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 105 Wn.2d 663, 717 P.2d 760 (1986). Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc. (hereafter FPL) appeals a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases