1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 882 F.2d
  5. 882 F.2d 1576 (1989)
 

IN RE HAMILTON

No. 89-1069.

882 F.2d 1576 (1989)

In re James T. HAMILTON.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 16, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Van Santen, Wood, Dalton, Phillips, Mason & Rowe, Chicago, Ill., argued for appellant. With him on the brief was J. Ray Wood.

Lee E. Barrett, Associate Sol., Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Fred E. McKelvey, Sol.

Before FRIEDMAN and RICH, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the July 26, 1988, decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board) on Hamilton's patent application for a business form. The board sustained the examiner's rejection of six claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) on the ground that the claimed business forms having horizontal perforations were on sale more than one year before Hamilton filed his application. The board reversed the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases