BRADLEY v. U.S.

No. 88-1435.

870 F.2d 1578 (1989)

Daniel BRADLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 29, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence J. Sherman, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was William B. Peer, of Barr, Peer & Cohen, Washington, D.C.

Eric L. Miller, of the Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Robert A. Reutershan, Asst. Director, and John E. Kosloske. Of counsel was William G. Colbert, of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Dept. of the Treasury.

Before NIES and ARCHER, Circuit Judges, and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.


NIES, Circuit Judge.

Appellants are journeymen plate printers, currently or formerly employed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) of the Department of the Treasury (DOT), and their local union (collectively, hereinafter, "printers"). Asserting entitlement under 5 U.S.C. § 5349 (1982) to back pay, they filed suit in the United States Claims Court seeking a retroactive award to April 1, 1983, or, at least, to various more recent dates. The government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases