AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. v. MACHINE TOOL WORKS, OERLIKON-BUEHRLE LTD.

No. 88-1351.

886 F.2d 1310 (1989)

AEROJET-GENERAL CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MACHINE TOOL WORKS, OERLIKON-BUEHRLE LTD., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 5, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Schroeder, Pretty, Schroeder, Brueggeman & Clark, Los Angeles, Cal., submitted, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief, was Edward G. Poplawski.

Jay R. Ziegler, Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, Los Angeles, Cal., submitted, for defendant-appellee.

Andrew P. Vance, Thomas D. Rosenwein, William T. Bullinger, J. Gary McDavid and George E. Hutchinson, The Federal Bar Ass'n, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, amicus curiae, for The Federal Circuit Bar Ass'n.

Joseph R. Re, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, of Newport Beach, California, was on the brief, amicus curiae, for American Intellectual Property Law Ass'n.

Charles A. Wendel, Lyon & Lyon, and Steven E. Lipman, Fish & Richardson, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, amicus curiae, for Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law Section, The District of Columbia Bar.

Joseph R. Magnone, Eric H. Weisblatt and Teresa Stanek Rea, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, Alexandria, Va., were on the brief, amicus curiae, for Bar Ass'n of the District of Columbia, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Section.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, RICH, NIES, NEWMAN, BISSELL, ARCHER, MAYER and MICHEL, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Having considered in banc the jurisdictional question set forth in this court's Order of May 23, 1989, the court has determined that it does have subject matter jurisdiction and that an opinion explaining the basis for that determination will issue in due course.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) In view of settlement negotiations the joint motion to stay a decision on the merits and other jurisdictional issues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases