MARRIOTT CORP. v. HAYWARD BAKER CO.

No. 88-924.

43 Ohio St. 3d 175 (1989)

MARRIOTT CORPORATION, APPELLEE, v. HAYWARD BAKER COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Russell P. Herrold, Jr., and Carl D. Smallwood, for appellee.

Frutig, Polito & Travis Co., L.P.A., Thomas R. Frutig and Dennis P. Zapka, for appellant Hayward Baker Company.

Bieser, Greer & Landis, David C. Greer and Geoffrey P. Walker, for appellant Carlisle Construction Company.

Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling and William L. Havemann, for appellant Koehring Company.


On authority of Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Straley (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 372, 533 N.E.2d 764, the trial court's grant of summary judgment as to all defendants is reinstated. The appellate decision is reversed as to Koehring Company and Carlisle Construction Company, and is reversed on the tort issue as to Hayward Baker Company. That portion of the appellate court's judgment involving a contract issue between Marriott...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases