U.S. v. WIRSING

Nos. 87-1184, 87-1192.

867 F.2d 1227 (1989)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Clark WIRSING and Arthur Robert Lenz, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 13, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Gibson, III, N. Patrick Flanagan, III, Reno, Nev., for defendants-appellants.

Brad Simon, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FERGUSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, District Judge.


WILSON, District Judge:

Defendants Craig Clark Wirsing and Arthur Robert Lenz appeal their criminal convictions, contending that the district court erred in not granting their motions to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). In particular, appellants challenge various rulings excluding time from Speedy Trial Act calculation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases