MOORE v. TATE

No. 88-3808.

882 F.2d 1107 (1989)

James MOORE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Arthur TATE, Jr., Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 24, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied October 10, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gwendolyn R. Bowers (argued), Dayton, Ohio, for James Moore.

Stuart A. Cole, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Columbus, Ohio, for Arthur Tate, Jr., Supt.

Mathias H. Heck, Carley J. Ingram, Dayton, Ohio, for State of Ohio, amicus curiae.

Before KENNEDY and JONES, Circuit Judges, and SILER, District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 10, 1989.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals from the district court's grant of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1982). Respondent contends that the district court erred in concluding that the state trial court's exclusion of certain expert testimony violated petitioner's due process rights. After careful consideration, we find that petitioner was not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases