STATE v. SHATTUCK

No. 21895-6-I.

55 Wn. App. 131 (1989)

776 P.2d 1001

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RANDALL SHATTUCK, Petitioner.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

August 7, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann Ryan of Associated Counsel for the Accused, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Jeffrey Smith and Donald J. Raz, Deputies, for respondent.


COLEMAN, C.J.

Randall Shattuck seeks discretionary review of the Superior Court's decision affirming a judgment and sentence for driving while intoxicated entered in Bellevue District Court. Shattuck complains that the trial court erred in finding that he had waived the right to raise any factual issues in defense of his prosecution on stipulated evidence. We affirm.

Shattuck was arrested and charged with driving while intoxicated on October 27, 1984. Shattuck...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases