1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 112 Wn.2d
  5. 112 Wn.2d 68 (1989)
 

ESTATE OF FRIEDMAN v. PIERCE CTY.

No. 55192-8.

112 Wn.2d 68 (1989)

768 P.2d 462

THE ESTATE OF BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, ET AL, Petitioners, v. PIERCE COUNTY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 23, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, by Timothy J. Whitters and Patricia K. Schafer, for petitioners.

Joseph F. Quinn (of McCormick, Hoffman, Rees, Faubion & Quinn, P.S.), Special Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

This case concerns a claim for damages by property owners on the ground of an inverse condemnation — a taking or damaging by zoning. The trial court granted summary judgment to defendant Pierce County, holding that plaintiff's action was premature in that plaintiffs had not exhausted their administrative remedies. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Estate of Friedman v. Pierce Cy.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases