DICKENS v. STATE OF MO., BY ASHCROFT

No. 89-1216.

887 F.2d 895 (1989)

Patrick H. DICKENS, individually, and as natural father of deceased minor, John H. Dickens; Alice R. Dickens, individually, and as natural mother of deceased minor, John H. Dickens, Appellants, v. The STATE OF MISSOURI, by way of John ASHCROFT, Governor, William Webster, Attorney General, Wendell Bailey, Treasurer, John A. Pelzer, Commissioner of Office of Administration, all in their official capacities; The Missouri State Board of Education, by way of its board of directors, in their official capacities, Roseann Bentley, Dan L. Blackwell, Terry A. Bond, Thomas R. Davis, Susan D. Finke, Raymond F. McCallister, Jr., Cynthia B. Thompson and Roger L. Tolliver; The St. Louis Board of Education, by way of its board members, all in their official capacities, Richard K. Gaines, Thomas Bugel, Louis Fister, Shirley Kiel, John Mahoney, Marjorie Smith, Douglas Rush, Penelope Alcott, Dorothy Springer, Earl Nance, Jr., Eddie Davis, Joyce Thomas; Jerome B. Jones, Superintendent of the St. Louis Public Schools, in his official capacity; Mary Beth Purdy, individually and in her official capacity as Principal of Classical Jr. Academy, St. Louis Public School; Veronica Hughes, individually and in her official capacity as teacher at Classical Jr. Academy, St. Louis, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided October 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodora W. Weston, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

Margaret M. Mooney, St. Louis, Mo., and Robert Presson, Jefferson City, Mo., for appellees.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.


PER CURIAM.

Patrick and Alice Dickens appeal the district court's1 dismissal of their claim for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of Missouri, the Missouri State Board of Education, the St. Louis Board of Education and various officials and employees of these entities (appellees). Upon review, we affirm.

The Dickenses brought this suit seeking damages and prospective relief after their ten...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases