HOLCOMB v. HOLCOMB

No. 88-381.

44 Ohio St. 3d 128 (1989)

HOLCOMB, APPELLANT, v. HOLCOMB, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Swope, for appellant.

Spetnagel & Benson and J. Jeffrey Benson, for appellee.


MOYER, C. J.

The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to divide appellee's pension plan and in not awarding sustenance alimony to appellant. Due to the nature of the question, we first address the property division before the award of sustenance alimony.

After a divorce has been granted, the trial court is required to equitably divide and distribute the marital estate between the parties and thereafter consider whether...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases