HOLCOMB v. HOLCOMB

No. 88-381.

44 Ohio St. 3d 128 (1989)

HOLCOMB, APPELLANT, v. HOLCOMB, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Swope, for appellant.

Spetnagel & Benson and J. Jeffrey Benson, for appellee.


MOYER, C. J.

The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in failing to divide appellee's pension plan and in not awarding sustenance alimony to appellant. Due to the nature of the question, we first address the property division before the award of sustenance alimony.

After a divorce has been granted, the trial court is required to equitably divide and distribute the marital estate between the parties and thereafter consider whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases