STATE v. LOPEZ

88-02-4251-C; CA A48368.

768 P.2d 934 (1989)

95 Or.App. 325

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Jose Ruiz LOPEZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Marvin Kuhn, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Vera Langer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


GRABER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

The trial court found these facts, which are supported by evidence in the record. The Malheur County Narcotics Task Force was conducting surveillance of defendant, knew that he was a heroin addict, and knew that his driving privileges had been suspended. On January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases