MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF VAN ACKER

88-1-CV; CA A48795.

775 P.2d 921 (1989)

97 Or.App. 343

In the matter of the Marriage of Jana M. VAN ACKER, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, AND Gustaf M. Van Acker, Jr., Appellant — Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 28, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Crane, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Crane & Foltyn, Klamath Falls.

Richard L. Garbutt, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent — cross-appellant.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Husband appeals from a judgment modifying his child support obligation imposed by the original Alaska divorce decree. Wife cross-appeals. The sole issue is whether the Oregon court had in personam jurisdiction over him. We conclude that it did not and that his motion to dismiss should have been granted.

Husband and wife were married in Tulelake, California, in 1970. They never lived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases