STATE v. McKENZIE

C87-02-30673; CA A44952.

775 P.2d 907 (1989)

97 Or.App. 267

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Richard Leon McKenzie, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ingrid A. MacFarlane and Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for respondent.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court to consider defendant's claim that ORS 162.135(4) is unconstitutionally vague. State v. McKenzie, 307 Or. 554, 771 P.2d 264 (1989). The pertinent facts are in the Supreme Court's opinion and in our previous opinion, 92 Or.App. 647, 759 P.2d 1123 (1988).

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases