GOODALE v. LACHOWSKI

A8702-01082; CA A47306.

775 P.2d 888 (1989)

97 Or.App. 158

Charles GOODALE and Robert Friedsam, Respondents, v. Richard LACHOWSKI, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Murphy, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Douglas G. Pickett, and Hanna, Murphy, Jensen & Holloway, P.C., Portland.

William E. Hurley, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Defendant appeals the trial court's denial of his motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The issue is whether the trial court was correct in allowing the jury to award punitive damages when the only other relief sought and received by plaintiffs was an accounting. We affirm.

For approximately 20 years, plaintiffs and defendant operated a court reporting service together. By agreement of the parties, each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases