1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 542 So.2d
  5. 542 So.2d 1065 (1989)
 

HECHLER v. I-T-E CIRCUIT BREAKER CO.

Nos. 88-0163, 88-0364.

542 So.2d 1065 (1989)

Sally HECHLER, Appellant, v. I-T-E CIRCUIT BREAKER COMPANY, a Corporation, and Gould, Inc., et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 10, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack H. Vital, III, and Diana Santa-Maria of Sheldon J. Schlesinger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Betsy E. Gallagher and Stephen Schmed of Kubicki, Bradley, Draper, Gallagher & McGrane, P.A., Miami, for appellee-Gould, Inc., d/b/a Gould Nat. Batteries, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment in favor of the defendant manufacturer, which held that the action was barred under the applicable statute of repose. See Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1985).

In Smith v. Department of Insurance, 507 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1987), the supreme court reaffirmed the standard enunciated in Kluger v. White,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases