1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 870 F.2d
  5. 870 F.2d 642 (1989)
 

SOLAREX CORP. v. ARCO SOLAR, INC.

No. 88-1542.

870 F.2d 642 (1989)

SOLAREX CORPORATION and RCA Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ARCO SOLAR, INC., Defendant-Appellant, v. The AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jai Ho Rho, of Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Harold E. Wurst, of Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst, Los Angeles, Cal.

Richard A. Meserve, of Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Bruce N. Kuhlik, of Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C.

Before RICH, NIES and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.

NIES, Circuit Judge.

Arco Solar, Inc. seeks reversal of an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, In re American Physical Society, No. 87 Misc. 223 (E.D.N.Y. June 22, 1988) (Sifton, J.), denying Arco's motion to compel discovery in a patent suit which asserted infringement of, inter alia, United States Patent No. 4,064,521 ('521). RCA Corporation and Solarex Corporation brought that suit against Arco in Delaware...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases