1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 45 Ohio
  5. 45 Ohio St. 3d 104 (1989)
 

STATE v. FINNERTY

No. 88-1720.

45 Ohio St. 3d 104 (1989)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. FINNERTY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 23, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. White, prosecuting attorney, and Jonathan E. Rosenbaum, for appellant.

Smith & Smith Attorneys, Gerald M. Smith and Daniel Wightman, for appellee.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

The issue before this court is when the prosecution, upon a proper discovery request, fails to furnish the defendant with the name of a known rebuttal witness, must the trial court exclude the testimony of the rebuttal witness?

Crim. R. 16 provides for discovery and inspection by either party in a criminal action.2 Crim. R. 16(B) imposes on the prosecutor a duty to disclose certain information upon a proper...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases