DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MARTIN

No. D.D. 88-31.

43 Ohio St. 3d 81 (1989)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MARTIN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Karen B. Hull, for relator.

David Lee Martin, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

We agree with the board's findings that respondent violated DR 9-102(A), 1-102(A)(3) and (4), 7-101(A)(3), and 1-102(A)(6) (two violations). However, we do not adopt the board's recommended sanctions.

We do not condone respondent's actions, but we are impressed with the testimonials appended to respondent's brief describing his general good character and competence. We also believe that these were isolated incidents that are not likely to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases