1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 767 P.2d
  5. 767 P.2d 467 (1989)
 

BENJFRAN DEV. v. METRO. SERVICE DIST.

LUBA 88-039; CA A50068.

767 P.2d 467 (1989)

95 Or.App. 22

BENJFRAN DEVELOPMENT, Inc., Petitioner, v. METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT, Ronald Crisman, M. Kathleen Crisman, Jerry Ross, Teresa Ross, J.D. Lane, Elizabeth Lane, Antoine Kanaan, Diana Kanaan, Joseph Robert Breivogel, Patricia McIntyre, Patricia Kliewer, William Schamber, Janet Trapp, Jonathan F. Gray, John R. Keith, Susanna B. Keith, Donna J. Lustoff, William E. Ryan, Verda Teale, Susanna Stephenson, Michael L. Stephenson, Michael Fulton, Linda Tindle, Lianne McNeil, John Churchill, for Northwest Environmental Defense Council and the Tualatin Riverkeepers, and 1000 Friends of Oregon, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory S. Hathaway, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Hanna, Murphy, Jensen & Holloway, Portland.

Daniel B. Cooper, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Metropolitan Service Dist. On the brief was Lawrence S. Shaw, Portland.

Edward J. Sullivan, Portland, argued the cause for respondents, except Metropolitan Service Dist. and 1000 Friends of Oregon. With him on the brief were Peggy Hennessy, and Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland.

Keith Bartholomew, Portland, argued the cause for respondent 1000 Friends of Oregon. With him on the brief was Neil S. Kagan, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARREN and DEITS, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's affirmance of the Metropolitan Service District (Metro) denial of an amendment to its acknowledged metropolitan urban growth boundary (UGB). The amendment would have added an area of approximately 500 acres, which petitioner wished to use as the site of an "advance performance standards regional industrial park." That project, according to petitioner, would attract industry and jobs to the region, is akin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases