MATTER OF COMPENSATION OF HUNNICUTT

WCB Nos. 87-18715, 87-18716; CA A48528.

768 P.2d 444 (1989)

95 Or.App. 375

In the matter of the Compensation of Russell V. HUNNICUTT, Claimant; and In the Matter of the Complying Status of Willis D. Dollarhyde, Employer. Russell V. Hunnicutt, Petitioner, v. Willis D. DOLLARHYDE and Saif Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Dolton, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent Willis D. Dollarhyde.

Darrell E. Bewley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and GRABER and RIGGS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The referee found that claimant is not a subject worker under ORS 656.027 and held that Dollarhyde is not, therefore, a noncomplying employer. ORS 656.023. Claimant has petitioned for judicial review of that order under ORS ch. 183.

SAIF concedes that Dollarhyde is an employer under ORS 656.029(1).1 Both Dollarhyde and the referee misread ORS 656.027(3)2<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases