1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 380 S.E.2d
  5. 380 S.E.2d 796 (1989)
 

BOLTON CORP. v. T.A. LOVING CO.

No. 8810SC1292.

380 S.E.2d 796 (1989)

BOLTON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. T.A. LOVING COMPANY, Defendant. William E. BOLTON, III, Plaintiff, v. T.A. LOVING COMPANY, and Bolton Corporation, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Graham & James by J. Jerome Hartzell and Mark Anderson Finkelstein, Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellants and plaintiffs-appellees.

Poyner & Spruill by David W. Long, Susan K. Nichols and David M. Barnes, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant and defendant-appellee.

ARNOLD, Judge.

This action presents the following issues to this Court: (1) Was there sufficient evidence of negligence to preclude defendant's motion for directed verdict on that claim? (2) Is the contract provision which identifies Loving as project expediter valid? (3) Is the architect's allocation of responsibility for delay final, absent bad faith? (4) What theory of damages, and what evidence of damages may be presented? (5) When the State granted a change order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases