GOULD v. ALLECO, INC.

Nos. 88-3637, 88-3638.

883 F.2d 281 (1989)

David P. GOULD; Marks, Inc.; Lawrence I. Weisman, Philip Doccolo; Rocko, Inc.; Patrick L. Day, Trustee for James M. Weisman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALLECO, INC.; Morton M. Lapides; Henry Weitz; Edward A. Weisman; Harry J. Conn; David H. Cohen; Robert H. Heller; William D. Houser; Frederic K. Raiff; Arthur F. Staley; David C. Barr; John E. Baker; Jeffrey R. Lapides; Heather A. Ditto; Jayme Dorf; Mark A. Garfinkle; David S. Klein; Donn A. Lewis; Jeffrey E. Mann; J. Tighe Merkert; Joan L. Nickel; Frank E. Silvestro; Norman B. Weisman; Deborah A. Wenner; C.J. Nelson; Harry J. Kane; Pamela Lapides; Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Company; Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Now — Peat, Marwick, Main & Company; Laventhol & Worwath; American Security Bank; Perpetual Savings Bank; Squire, Sanders and Dempsey; Marshall M. Meyer, Defendants — Appellees. Appeal of Lawrence I. WEISMAN; David P. Gould; Marks, Inc.; Philip Doccolo; Rocko, Inc.; Patrick L. Day, Trustee for James M. Weisman. Leonard ROBINSON; Patricia Robinson, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. ALLEGHENY BEVERAGE CORPORATION; Morton M. Lapides; Henry Weitz; Marshall M. Meyer; Edward A. Weisman; Harry J. Conn, Defendants — Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided August 16, 1989.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied September 8, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Reed Burton for plaintiffs-appellants.

Bruce K. Cohen (Meredith & Cohen, P.C., on brief), Stephen Howard Glickman (Leslie A. Blackmon, Auckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker; A. Raymond Randolph, Daniel I. Prywes, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz; Steven A. Allen, Davis, Weikel & Allen, on brief) for defendants-appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied September 8, 1989.

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Lawrence I. Weisman and two others appeal from the denial of a motion to intervene in Robinson v. Allegheny Beverage Corporation, CA No. S-88-2399 (D.Md.) and from the order approving a class settlement of the same case. Weisman also appeals from the district court's refusal to address his objections to the settlement proposal. The district court determined that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases