1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 875 F.2d
  5. 875 F.2d 224 (1989)
 

IN RE BLOOM

No. 88-5956.

875 F.2d 224 (1989)

In re Edith BLOOM, M.D., Debtor. William A. GOICHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edith BLOOM, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 15, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Goichman, Encino, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard M. Moneymaker, Moneymaker & Kelley, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before WALLACE, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

William Goichman appeals an award of compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and punitive damages under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h). Section 362(h)1 has received almost no scrutiny in our published opinions. We affirm in part, and remand for determination of the rate of interest.

FACTS

Goichman, Edith Bloom, and others invested money in a series of limited partnerships that failed....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases