D.C. METRO. POLICE DEPT. v. BROADUS

Nos. 86-981, 86-1174.

560 A.2d 501 (1989)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. Van E. BROADUS, Jr., Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 9, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward E. Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Acting Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellant.

David E. Schreiber, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before NEWMAN and BELSON, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.


NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

The question presented is whether the criminal indictment for offenses committed by an off-duty police officer with his service revolver constitutes "cause" for suspension without pay from the police force under D.C.Code § 1-617.1(d)(16) (1981). The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) contends that the trial court's affirmance of the decision of the District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals (OEA) reversing Broadus' suspension without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases