BEHAR v. TOYOTA OF FAYETTEVILLE, INC.

No. 8812SC42.

369 S.E.2d 618 (1988)

Jack BEHAR and Rita Behar v. TOYOTA OF FAYETTEVILLE, INC. and Sandtana Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 21, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hedahl & Radtke by Joan E. Hedahl, Fayetteville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Rodney A. Guthrie, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant.


SMITH, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing Toyota's appeal for failure to give timely notice of appeal. For reasons set out herein, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.

The trial court determined that the entry of judgment was 8 May 1987 when the jury returned a verdict requiring Toyota to pay plaintiffs $22,900.00 and requiring plaintiffs to return the 1984 Toyota motor home to Toyota. Toyota contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases