U.S. CANE SUGAR REFINERS ASS'N v. U.S.

Court No. 88-09-00740.

698 F.Supp. 266 (1988)

UNITED STATES CANE SUGAR REFINERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants.

United States Court of International Trade.

October 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, (A. Douglas Melamed, Robert C. Cassidy Jr. and Eric R. Markus, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C. (Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office and John J. Mahon, Commercial Litigation Branch), New York City, for defendants.

Steptoe & Johnson (W. George Grandison and Stephen D. Ramsey, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendant intervenors Redpath Sugars, Atlantic Sugars, Ltd. and Canadian Sugar Institute.

Miller and Chevalier (Grant D. Aldonas and Homer E. Moyer, Jr., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for defendant intervenor Allen Sugar Co.


ORDER

WATSON, Judge:

Following a motion by the government, this action was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction at a hearing held on October 4, 1988. This opinion sets out the background of the action and gives the reasons for the dismissal.

The plaintiffs are domestic producers of cane sugar and beet sugar. In April of 1988 plaintiffs petitioned the Secretary of the Treasury under Section 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930, (19 U.S.C. § 1516) to alter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases