1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 146 Wis.2d
  5. 146 Wis.2d 804 (1988)
 

MENTZEL v. CITY OF OSHKOSH

No. 87-1607.

146 Wis.2d 804 (1988)

432 N.W.2d 609

Donald MENTZEL, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CITY OF OSHKOSH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided October 12, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf on the defendant-appellant, their were briefs and oral argument by John W. Pence, city attorney, Oshkosh.

On behalf of the petitioner-respondent, their was a brief and oral argument by Eugene A. Bartman, of Curtis-Wilde Law Offices of Oshkosh.

Before Scott, C.J., Brown, P.J., and Nettesheim, J.

BROWN, P.J.

This is a review of a trial court's conclusion that an inverse condemnation occurred. The city of Oshkosh claims that it did not "take" Donald Mentzel's property, and that the trial court misread the law in deciding otherwise. We hold that the trial court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the court correctly applied the law. We affirm the trial court's finding of inverse condemnation and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases