1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 847 F.2d
  5. 847 F.2d 90 (1988)
 

MARY ANN PENSIERO, INC. v. LINGLE

No. 87-5588.

847 F.2d 90 (1988)

MARY ANN PENSIERO, INC. d/b/a Bargain Beer and Soda v. Robert L. LINGLE and Betty M. Lingle t/a Lingle Distributing. Appeal of LITMAN, LITMAN, HARRIS, BROWN & WATZMAN, P.C.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided May 24, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Manion (argued), Manion, McDonough & Lucas, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Stephen L. Grose (argued), Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellees.

Before GIBBONS, Chief Judge, WEIS and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge.*

Counsel for plaintiffs appeal the imposition of sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for failure to reasonably investigate the facts and research the law before filing the complaint in this antitrust suit. We conclude that the record reveals adequate compliance with the pre-filing requirements of Rule 11, and we will therefore vacate the award of sanctions. Moreover, to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases