MAGGIO v. PRUZANSKY


222 N.J. Super. 567 (1988)

537 A.2d 756

CARMEN J. MAGGIO AND EDYTHE MAGGIO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STUART PRUZANSKY AND HERMYNE PRUZANSKY, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 18, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McOmber & McOmber attorneys for appellants (J. Peter Sokol of counsel and on the brief).

Ravin, Greenberg & Zackin attorneys for respondents (Allan M. Harris of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, BAIME and ASHBEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

This appeal involves a dispute between neighbors as to their common property boundary line. The trial judge, after a bench trial, entered judgment for plaintiffs Carmen J. and Edythe Maggio with respect to a strip of land running parallel to a masonry retaining wall which was entirely on the property of the adjoining owners, defendants Stuart and Hermyne Pruzansky. The Pruzanskys appeal, arguing that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases