KISLAK CO., INC. v. HIRSCHFELD


222 N.J. Super. 553 (1988)

537 A.2d 748

THE KISLAK COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ABRAHAM HIRSCHFELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND T/A WEST PARK WASHINGTON CORP., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irwin I. Kimmelman argued the cause for appellant (Kimmelman, Wolff & Samson, attorneys; Ronald E. Wiss and Andrew J. Miller, on the brief).

Frederick M. Testa argued the cause for respondent (Frederick M. Testa, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER and ASHBEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Defendant, Abraham Hirschfeld, individually and trading as West Park Washington Corp., appeals from a judgment of $200,000, plus approximately $63,000 in prejudgment interest, awarded to plaintiff The Kislak Company, Inc., a real estate broker. The judgment was based upon a commission which the trial judge found to be due and payable to plaintiff as a result of the sale by defendant through another broker of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases