1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 36 Ohio
  5. 36 Ohio St. 3d 36 (1988)
 

HILL v. SONITROL OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO, INC.

No. 86-2088.

36 Ohio St. 3d 36 (1988)

HILL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SONITROL OF SOUTHWESTERN OHIO, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jablinski, Folino, Roberts, Schultz & Martin Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Schultz and David S. Jablinski, for appellants.

Freund, Freeze & Arnold, Neil F. Freund and Shauna K. McSherry, for appellee Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.

Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Thomas H. Pyper and Michael E. Solimine, for appellee Sonitrol Corporation.

MOYER, C.J.

Appellants present the following three issues for our determination: whether a security alarm system company owes a duty of protection to the employee of a commercial establishment under a contract between the commercial establishment and the security alarm system company for the protection of the commercial establishment after it is closed for the day; whether the employee is a third-party intended beneficiary or an incidental beneficiary of the contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases