KONOSKI v. ROMANO


144 A.D.2d 541 (1988)

John Konoski, Respondent, v. Ralph T. Romano, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Ralph T. Romano, Appellant, v. John Konoski, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 21, 1988


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In light of the common questions of law and fact in these actions, both of which arise out of a retainer agreement, the court properly consolidated them (CPLR 602 [a]). Further, under the circumstances, the court did not abuse its discretion in fixing venue of the consolidated action in Suffolk County, which was the county in which the first action was commenced (CPLR 602;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases