Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's position, the trial court did not err in refusing to charge the jury on the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance (see, Penal Law § 125.25 [1] [a]). No reasonable view of the evidence adduced at the trial would establish that at the time of his mother's killing, the defendant was acting under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance and that a reasonable explanation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.