1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 111 Wn.2d
  5. 111 Wn.2d 537 (1988)
 

STATE v. WORRELL

No. 53914-6.

111 Wn.2d 537 (1988)

761 P.2d 56

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JAMES E. WORRELL, JR., Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 8, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mestel & Muenster, by John R. Muenster, for appellant.

Gary A. Riesen, Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

In this case we consider the constitutionality of the kidnapping in the first degree statute under the due process void-for-vagueness doctrine and conclude that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague.

In late 1986, the defendant James E. Worrell, Jr., went to a construction site and forced John Bishop at gunpoint to leave the site with him. He took Bishop to the retail shop of the defendant's wife at a local shopping...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases