Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to charge petit larceny as a lesser included offense of robbery in the second degree. We disagree.
Under no reasonable view of the evidence could the jury have found that the defendant committed petit larceny without having also committed robbery in the second degree as charged (see, CPL 300.50 [1]; People v White,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
