MOORE v. WILSON

22903

296 S.C. 326 (1988)

372 S.E.2d 360

Thomas L. MOORE, as a member of the Edgefield County Legislative Delegation; and John W. Pettigrew, Jr., as a citizen, elector and taxpayer of Edgefield County and as a member of the Edgefield County Legislative Delegation, Respondents v. Addison G. WILSON, as Chairman of the Joint Legislative Delegation of Highway District No. Eleven; Jarvis R. Klapman, as Secretary of the Joint Legislative Delegation of Highway District No. Eleven; Ryan C. Shealy, Nikki G. Setzler, John H. Burris, Paul W. Derrick, John G. Felder, Larry L. Koon, Charles R. Sharpe and C. Lenoir Sturkie as Lexington County members of the Joint Legislative Delegation of Highway District No. Eleven; John Drummond and Jennings G. McAbee as McCormick County members of the Joint Legislative Delegation of Highway District No. Eleven; Thomas H. Pope, III, and Larry E. Gentry as Saluda County members of the Joint Legislative Delegation of Highway District No. Eleven; John T. Campbell as Secretary of State of South Carolina; and Clark DuBose as State Highway and Public Transportation Commissioner, District No. Eleven, Defendants, of whom Addison G. Wilson, Ryan C. Shealy, Larry L. Koon, and Clark DuBose are Appellants. Appeal of Addison G. WILSON, Ryan C. Shealy, Larry L. Koon and Clark Dubose.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 29, 1988.

Rehearing Denied September 21, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Breibart of Coleman, Sawyer, Breibart & McCauley, Lexington, for appellant Clark DuBose.

S. Jahue Moore of Kirkland, Taylor, Wilson, Moore, Allen & Deneen, PA., West Columbia, for appellant Addison G. Wilson.

William L. Todd of S.C. Dept. of Highways and Public Transp., Columbia, for appellants Ryan C. Shealy and Larry L. Koon.

Cameron M. Currie, Columbia, for respondents.


Heard August 17, 1988.

Decided August 29, 1988.

Rehearing Denied September 21, 1988.

ORDER ON DENIAL OF REHEARING.

Appellant Addison G. Wilson seeks a rehearing in this case. Respondents have filed a return opposing a rehearing and asking the court to issue a Rule to Show Cause. After careful review of the appellate record, the petition and our opinion, both the Petition for Rehearing and the Motion for a Rule to Show Cause are denied.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases