EYEDENT v. VICKERS MGT.


138 Misc.2d 459 (1988)

Frank Eyedent et al., Respondents, v. Vickers Management et al., Appellants, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

March 21, 1988


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Liebman, Adolf & Charme (Stephen M. Charme and James E. Schwartz of counsel), for appellants. Wayne G. Hawley and Theodore W. Zeichner for Frank Eyedent and others, respondents. Bruce Kramer and Janessa C. Nisley for Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, respondent.

PARNESS, J. P., and OSTRAU, J., concur; SANDIFER, J., dissents in a separate memorandum.


Per Curiam.

Order entered October 31, 1986 reversed, without costs, and petitioners' motion for an order compelling respondents to correct violations at the subject premises is denied, without prejudice to petitioners' right, if so advised, to maintain a proceeding for such relief as may be appropriate to compensate them for the loss of their tenancies.

The subject of this proceeding is premises 41-43 Avenue B in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases