Ordered that the ordered is affirmed, with costs.
We disagree with the plaintiff's contention that Justice Roberto abused his discretion in denying its motion to strike the defendant's answer and counterclaims due to the defendant's alleged failure to comply with Justice Roberto's prior conditional order (see, CPLR 3126). We find that in light of the defendant's assertion that it was unable to amplify its responses to certain interrogatories the court properly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.