BORREGINE v. KLANG


144 A.D.2d 415 (1988)

Joann Borregine et al., Appellants, v. David Klang et al., Defendants, and Carol Klang, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 14, 1988


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the respondent did not entrust her son with a dangerous instrumentality so as to be liable for the accident (cf., Nolechek v Gesuale, 46 N.Y.2d 332). The papers submitted by her in support of the motion for summary judgment alleged that at the time of the accident, her son was 16 years of age and possessed a New York State junior driver...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases