THURSTON v. CITY OF PHOENIX

No. 1 CA-CIV 9773.

157 Ariz. 343 (1988)

757 P.2d 619

Charles Harry THURSTON; Arthur Sykes and Beverly Sykes, his wife; Alan Marble and Cher Marble, his wife, Petitioners-Appellees, v. The CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation; Council of the City of Phoenix, a public body, Respondents-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

July 7, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedeman & O'Leary by John Friedeman, Phoenix, for petitioners-appellees.

Roderick G. McDougall, City Atty. by Larry F. Felix, Asst. City Atty., Phoenix, for respondents-appellants.


OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This appeal concerns the agenda requirements of the Arizona Open Meeting Law, A.R.S. § 38-431.02. We affirm the judgment of the trial court setting aside Phoenix Ordinance G-2700, adopted on November 21, 1984, by which over nine square miles were annexed by the city.

In 1984, the City of Phoenix successfully circulated petitions proposing the annexation of approximately 12.8 square miles of land in an area adjacent...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases