1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 202 Cal.App.3d
  5. 202 Cal.App.3d 296 (1988)
 

SUNDSTROM v. COUNTY OF MENDOCINO

Docket No. A038922.

202 Cal.App.3d 296 (1988)

248 Cal. Rptr. 352

ROBERT T. SUNDSTROM, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF MENDOCINO et al., Defendants and Respondents; HAROLD K. MILLER, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

June 22, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Luke & Perry, Leslie R. Perry and Jan L. Turner for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Remy & Thomas and Sharon E. Duggan as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

H. Peter Klein, County Counsel, and Yves A. Hebert, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

Richard J. Henderson for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

NEWSOM, J.

Robert T. Sundstrom (hereafter appellant), appeals from a judgment of the Mendocino County Superior Court denying a petition for writ of mandate to set aside a use permit of Mendocino County (hereafter County) for noncompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Appellant owns a shopping mall in the small unincorporated coastal town of Gualala....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases