1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 38 Ohio
  5. 38 Ohio St. 3d 322 (1988)
 

WIREMAN v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTH.

No. 88-939.

38 Ohio St. 3d 322 (1988)

WIREMAN v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 31, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Wireman, pro se.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Alexander G. Thomas, for respondent Adult Parole Authority.

William F. Baader, for respondent court of common pleas.

Per Curiam.

Treating the pro se pleading as two distinct complaints, we consider, first, the complaint for a writ of procedendo. Such writ will be allowed to order a court of inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment in a given case. State, ex rel. Ratliff, v. Marshall (1972), 30 Ohio St.2d 101, 102, 59 O.O. 2d 114, 115, 282 N.E.2d 582, 584. However, complainant does not plead, and it does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases