R.R.Z. ASSOCIATES v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 87-1349.

38 Ohio St. 3d 198 (1988)

R.R.Z. ASSOCIATES, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel and Karen H. Bauernschmidt, for appellant.

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Richard A. Wise, for appellees.


Per Curiam.

We will consider appellant's first four propositions of law together.

Appellant argues that the board of revision can not be made a party to this proceeding under R.C. 5717.01 and thus may not present evidence to the BTA. Appellant further argues that after the county auditor establishes the property's value, he is estopped from asserting any other value, and may only correct clerical errors and omissions. Finally, appellant argues that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases